检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:纪术茂[1] 陈佩璋[1] 纪亚平[1] 董群慧 程刚[1]
机构地区:[1]西安市精神卫生中心,西安医科大学,西安飞机工业公司
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》1996年第1期20-23,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
摘 要:本文通过对MMPI基本量表间的相关分析和因子分析,并与跨文化资料进行比较,发现中文版和原版所测的人格维度基本一致:主要负荷精神质(P),神经质(N)和社会内向(I)因于,所解释的变异量为70%左右;其次,负荷性度(M)和社会判断和适应因子(A)。5个因子可解释变异量的80%左右。判别分析结果发现,MMPI对正常组和几组精神疾病的正确划组率达79.02%到88.28%。提示中文版有较好的结构效度。This study was to analyse the construct validity of the Chinese version of the MMPI.The validity study was carried out through analysis of its internal structure from three different perspectives:the intercorrelations between 13 basic scales of the MMPI,the extention and quality of its underlying dimensions(factor analysis)and test of its discriminative capacity between normals and clinical cases. The factor analytic study showed the underlying dimensions of this version are not different from that were found in the United States and several other countries.The series of discriminant analysis showed that the Chinese version of the MMPI effectively differentiates between normals and subjects who suffer from mental diseases. A percentage of″correct″classification was from 79.02%to 88.28%.The results Suggested that Chinese version of MMPI had good constructlve validity.
分 类 号:R749[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15