“神秘之域”的产生与消解——维特根斯坦前期哲学的困境及其出路  

The Emergence of “Mystical Field” and It's Removal——The Predicament of Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy and it's Outlet

作　　者：吴玉军[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学哲学系,北京100875

出　　处：《山西大学师范学院学报》2001年第1期1-5,共5页Journal of Teachers College of Shanxi University

摘　　要：受盎格鲁—萨克森和德国两种哲学传统的影响 ,维特根斯坦在《逻辑哲学论》中借助语言分析的途径 ,力图为“神秘之域”求得避难之所 ,但是却造成了可说的世界与不可说的“神秘之域”的分离。其后期哲学一改前期哲学的立场 ,不再对语言进行形而上的玄思 ,而是注重考察语言的日常用法。维特根斯坦正是通过“语言游戏”说与“生活形式”论 ,抹平了可说的东西与不可说的东西的界限 ,“神秘之域”Influenced by both Anglo-Saxon and German philosophical tradition,Wittgenstein strove to find a refuge for “Mystical Field” through the method of language analysis in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. But the result is that what can be said is separated from what connot be said. In his later philosophy,Wittgenstein changed his early position. He did not do metaphysical meditation on language. On the contrary,he paid more attention to the daily usage of language. Through the discussion about “Language-games” and the “Form of Life”,Wittgenstein eliminated the boundary between what can be said and what can not be said. So the “mystical things” are lost in daily life.

关 键 词：维持根斯坦 "神秘之域" 前期哲学 《逻辑哲学论》 后期哲学 差异 

分 类 号：B521[哲学宗教—外国哲学] B505