对行政诉讼举证责任分配理论的再思考  

Rethinking the Theories on Allocation of the Burden of Proof in Administrative Litigation

作　　者：余凌云[1] 周云川[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学法律系,北京100038

出　　处：《中国人民大学学报》2001年第4期95-100,共6页Journal of Renmin University of China

摘　　要：行政诉讼举证责任分配是行政程序证明责任的延续和再现 ,其基本的标准为 :诉讼的提起 ,要求原告应首先负推进的责任 ;在行政诉讼程序中主张权利成立的一方在行政诉讼中仍要对权利成立要件负举证责任 ,另一方对所主张的权利妨害要件或者权利消灭要件负举证责任。但是 ,上述分配规则如果在特定的情境中产生不合理、违背行政诉讼目的的结果时 。How to allocate the burden of proof in administrative litigation to a large extent depends on the situation of proving in administrative procedure, i.e. in addition to the obliging of the private citizen to take the initiative in launching proceedings against public authority, where the burden of proof lies during court hearing is determined by who insists on the existing of his right or interest during administrative procedure. But if, in special cases, this general rule is inconsistent with the purpose of administrative litigation, then it has to be corrected.

关 键 词：行政诉讼 举证责任分配 行政诉讼法 行政程序证明责任 行政诉讼模式 当事人主义 职权主义 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]