检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋一鸣[1] 朱士驹[1] 蔡含[1] 奉典旭[1] 韩峰[1]
机构地区:[1]上海市普陀区中心医院普外科,上海200062
出 处:《同济大学学报(医学版)》2001年第2期27-28,共2页Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
摘 要:目的 评价经肝动脉灌注化疗与静脉化疗治疗结肠癌肝转移的疗效。方法 64例结肠癌肝转移患者随机分为肝动脉灌注化疗组和静脉化疗组。两组均采用FAM方案化疗。分析两组的CR、PR、RR及 1、2、3年生存率。结果 肝动脉灌注化疗组的CR、PR、RR显著高于静脉化疗组 ( 2 0 %vs.8.6% ,4 7.5 %vs.2 2 .3 % ,67.5 %vs.3 1.7% ,P <0 .0 5 ) ;肝动脉灌注化疗组的 1、2、3年生存率也显著高于静脉化疗组 ( 84 .4 %vs.2 1.9% ,5 9.4 %vs.6.3 % ,3 4 .4 %vs.0 % ,P <0 .0 5 )。Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of hepatic arterial infusion and venous chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with liver metastases from colon cancer.Methods Sixty four patients with liver metastases from colon cancer were randomly divided into hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) group and venous chemotherapy (VC) group. FAM chemtherapy protocol was used in both two groups. CR, PR, RR and 1 , 2 , 3 year survival rates in two groups were analyzed.Results CR, PR, RR in HAI group was significantly higher than that in VC group (20% vs. 8.6%; 47.5% vs. 22.3%; 67.5% vs. 31.7%, P <0.05, respectively). 1 ,2 , and 3 year survival rates in HAI group were also significantly higher than those in VC group (84.4% vs. 21.9%; 59.4% vs. 6.3%; 34.4% vs. 0%, P <0.05, respectively).Conclusion HAI was superior to VC group in the treatment of liver metastases from colon cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3