检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗瑞虹[1] 杨绍基[1] 谢俊强[1] 赵志新[1] 何有成[1] 姚集鲁[1]
机构地区:[1]中山医科大学附属第三医院传染病科,广州510630
出 处:《中华肝脏病杂志》2001年第3期148-150,共3页Chinese Journal of Hepatology
摘 要:目的 探讨慢性肝炎患者血清透明质酸(HA)、 Ⅲ型前胶原(PC Ⅲ)、Ⅳ型胶原(C Ⅳ)、层粘蛋白(LN)和转化生长因子 β1(TGβ1)对肝纤维化的诊断意义。方法检测 116例病毒性肝炎患者血清 HA、 PCⅢ、 C Ⅳ、 LN、 TGF β1水平,并与其中 87例慢性肝炎患者的肝组织病理作对比。结果血清 HA与肝组织炎症活动度呈较弱的正相关(r=0.393, P<0.05),血清 HA、 PC Ⅲ、 LN、 TGF β1与肝纤维化程度呈中等程度的正相关(r分别为 0.584、 0.454、 0.441和 0.612, P< 0.05),血清 C Ⅳ与之则呈较弱的正相关(r=0.319, P< 0.05)。血清 HA诊断肝硬化的 AUC明显大于血清PCⅢ、 C Ⅳ、 LN、 TGF β1者(AUC=0.904 vs 0.784、 0.815、 0.805、0.828, P< 0.05);血清 HA、 LN、 TGF β1判断S2期以上肝纤维化的 ROC曲线下面积(AUC)明显大于血清PC Ⅲ、 C Ⅳ者(AUC=0.849、 0.819、 0.836 vs 0.702、 0.721, P< 0.05)。联合五项指标估计肝纤维化程度,判别分析只选入血清 HA和Objective To research the diagnostic value of serum hyaluronic acid (HA), type Ⅲ procollagen (PC Ⅲ ), type IV collagen (CIV), laminin (LN), and transforming growth factor β 1 (TGF β1) for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis. Methods Serum levels of HA, PC Ⅲ , C IV, LN and TGF β 1 in 116 patients with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis were investigated and compared with hepatic histological findings of 87 patients. Results The correlation between serum HA and histologically assessed grade of inflammatory activity was weak (r=0.393, P<0.05). The correlation between serum HA, PC Ⅲ, LN, TGF β 1 and histologically assessed stage of liver fibrosis were all moderate (r=0.584, 0.454, 0.441 and 0.612, respectively, P<0.05), while that between serum C IV and histologically assessed stage of liver fibrosis was weak (r=0.319, P<0.05). As shown by the ROC curves in cases of chronic hepatitis, the ability to differentiate patients with cirrhosis from those without cirrhosis was greater for serum HA than that for serum PC Ⅲ , C IV, LN, and TGF β 1 (the areas under the curves=0.904 vs 0.784, 0.815, 0.805, 0.828, P<0.05). The ability of serum HA, LN and TGFβ1 to differentiate patients with extensive liver fibrosis from those with no or mild liver fibrosis exceeded that of serum PCⅢ and C IV(the areas under the curves=0.849, 0.819, 0.836 vs 0.702, 0.721, P<0.05). To discriminate the stage of liver fibrosis, serum HA and TGF 1 were selected from the five markers by Bayes discriminate analysis. If S1, S2 and S3 were not required to be discriminated, discrimination between the three stages showed significant difference (P<0.05). The predictive accurate percentage was 72.90%. Conclusions The five markers all have the ability not only to judge liver cirrhosis, in which the ability of serum HA is the best, but also to differentiate chronic hepatitis with extensive liver fibrosis from that with no or mild liver fibrosis, in which the ability of serum HA, LN, TGFβ1 is stronger than the other
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229