检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪本英[1]
出 处:《肿瘤防治研究》2001年第4期301-302,共2页Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的 探讨 NP与 EP方案对晚期非小细胞肺癌的近斯疗效。方法 用 NVB+ DDP( NP组 )与 VP- 1 6+ DDP( EP组 )联合化疗方案分别治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌。观察其近期疗效、并相比较。结果 NP组有效率为 46.4% ( 1 3/ 2 8) ,EP组为 34.6% ( 9/ 2 6) ,两组比较无显著性差异 ( P>0 .0 5)。结论 NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌近斯疗效较好 ,但与传统 EP方案比较无明显优越性 ,且副作用较多 。Objective To evaluate near therapeutic effect of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ,treated with NP regimen or EP regimen.Methods We have treated 54 patients with NSCLC using the combine chemotherapy regimen CNVB plus DDP or Vp 16 Plus DDP,(respectively),and observed their early therapeutic effects. Results The overall response rate of group A was 46.4%,and group B was 34.6%.There was no significant difference in survival rate between group NP and group EP. Conclusion The NP regimen is better chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC,but there are many side effects of NP regimen and we must consider them on application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145