检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈海支[1] 陈胜华[1] 李新胜[1] 林敬华[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北省十堰市东风公司茅箭医院精神科,442012
出 处:《医药导报》2001年第8期488-489,共2页Herald of Medicine
摘 要:目的 :比较万拉法新与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法 :将 68例患者随机分为两组 ,分别给予万拉法新及帕罗西汀治疗 ,于治疗前及治疗后 1,2 ,4,6周末分别用汉密尔顿抑郁量表 (HAMD)、临床疗效总评量表(CGI SI)及不良反应量表 (TESS)评定。结果 :第 2周末两组间HAMD评分差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 )。两组总有效率及副作用差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :万拉法新抗抑郁作用起效较快 ,疗效及副作用与帕罗西汀相当。Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine capsules and paroxetine tablets in the treatment of depression. Methods:68 subjects with depression were randomly divided into two groups and treated with venlafaxine capsules or paroxetine tablets, respectively, for 6 weeks. HAMD, CGL-SI, and TESS were used to evalate the patients at the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th week post-treatment. Result:The therapeutic efficacy was significantly different between the two groups(P<0.05). Conclusions:Venlafaxine capsule was a quicker agent than paroxetine tablet in respect of its effect. Both venlafaxine capsules and paroxetine tablets were effective and safe for the treatment of patients with depression.
关 键 词:万拉法新 帕罗西汀 抑郁症 药物疗法 治疗 对比研究
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R971.43[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222