匼河旧石器遗址6054和6056地点地层的再研究  

RESTUDY ON THE STRATA OF TWO PALEOLITHIC SITES AT KEHE

作　　者：吴文祥[1] 刘东生[1] 陈哲英[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,北京100029 [2]山西省考古研究所,山西太原030001

出　　处：《地层学杂志》2001年第4期303-306,共4页Journal of Stratigraphy

基　　金：国家自然科学基金 ( No.4989170 )资助项目

摘　　要：发现于 195 7年的河遗址群的年代一直存在较大的争议。对河遗址群中两个代表性的遗址的地层进行了再研究 ,认为 60 5 4地点文化层位于黄土—古土壤序列中 S2 以下 ,而 60 5 6地点位于马兰黄土之下 ,二者的时代有较大的差别 ,60 5 4地点可能比 60 5 6地点时代要早。The Kehe paleolithic sites, unearthed in 1957, remain one of the most important paleolithic archaeological discoveries in Shanxi Province, and play an important role in the history of paleolithic archaeology in China. Unfortunlly the age of culture layers has been disputed, this is mainly due to the misunderstanding of the loess covering the fluvial deposits. In this paper, the strata of localities 6054 and 6056, two representatives of the Kehe paleolithic sites were restudied, the stratigraphic section is measured in detail, and the samples of susceptibility are collected and analyzed. The strata at localities 6054 and 6056 consist of two kinds of sediments ranging from top to bottom of loess-paleosol sequence and fluvial(some lacustrine deposits at locality 6056) accumulations. There are great differences between the two localities: for the locality 6054, the loess-paleosol sequence is about 20m in thickness, including the eolian deposits of the S 0,L 1,S 1,L 2,S 2, while for the locality 6056, the upper part of the eolian deposits is just Malan loess, not the “red clay” originally attributed to. In the end an age of being not very different from Daili site is suggested for the Site 6054 and an age since the last interglacial period for the Site 6056.

关 键 词：Ke河遗址 黄土地层 磁化率 第四纪 山西 旧石器遗址 黄土-古土壤序列 

分 类 号：K871.11[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] P534.63[历史地理—历史学]