检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冉井富[1]
出 处:《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2001年第4期70-83,共14页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:拒绝作证作为一项特权,是在刑事诉讼中查明案情、追求实体真实的需要和另一种重要的社会利益发生了冲突的情况下,法律所作的一种特殊的利益协调。本文运用比较法的研究方法,对拒绝作证恃权中的这种利益冲突与协调作了全面而系统的考察,并在此基础之上,对我国刑事证据制度的立法完善作了初步的探讨。The privilege of refusal to bear witness is directed against the provision for the duty to bearing witness in general. That is to say, a litigant right for the subject that understands the details of a case to counter the witness bearing or search forced upon by judicial department This is a special coordination of interests provided by law in the situation where the necessity for knowing the truth of a case runs counter to another important social interest. In this paper is conducted a comprehensive and systematic investigation, by adopting the comparative approach, into this kind of conflict and coordination of interests in the event of privilege of exemption from bearing withess, on the basis of which is devoted a discussion on the legislative perfection of for China' s system of criminal evidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.37.17