检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾明[1]
出 处:《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2001年第4期34-38,共5页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:对于马克思在《巴黎手稿》中提出的“美的规律”的内涵,曾经引起美学界广泛和持久的争论。本文批评了把“美的规律”归于客体对象,即事物自身规律的观点,认为这是对马克思的误读。文章认为客体对象自身并不存在所谓“美的规律”,“美的规律”蕴涵在人类合规律与合目的的创造性的活动中,是属人的规律,是人自由创造的标志。The implication of 'The Laws of Beauty' put forward by Marx in Paris Manuscripts has brought about wide and sustained controversies. This paper criticizes the viewpoint that 'the Laws of Beauty belong to objects, or that 'the Laws of Beauty' are inherent rules of things. The paper deems that this viewpoint is derived from a misunderstanding of what Marx implied by 'the Laws of Beauty'. Also the paper argues that objects themselves do not possess the so-called ' Laws of Beauty ', and that 'the laws of Beauty' are implied in human creative activities which are governed by laws and rules and which serve purposes. Therefore, 'The Laws of Beauty' should belong to human beings, for they are indicators of man's free creative activities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225