检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]齐齐哈尔医学院第一附属医院神经内科,161041
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2001年第8期847-849,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
摘 要:目的 探讨病程超过 6小时的脑梗死动脉溶栓治疗的可行性。方法 44例脑梗死患者按病程分为A组 (病程≤ 6h)和B组 (病程 6~ 2 4h) ,两组均接受选择性动脉溶栓治疗。结果 对两组间的血管再通率、治疗前后神经功能缺损积分差值、病后 90天的巴氏指数、出血转化率和溶栓治疗中发生血管再通的时间进行比较 ,均无显著性差异。结论 部分脑梗死患者选择性动脉溶栓治疗时间窗可以延长至 6小时以后 。Objective To investigate the practicability in patients with acute cerebral infarction after 6 hours of stroke onset who received intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy.Methods 44 cases were divided into two groups(A and B)according to course of time within 6 hours and from 6 to 24 hours of stroke onset for received intra-arterial thombolytic therapy.Results There were no significant differences in recanalization rate,clinical outcome,cerebral hemorrhage inciednce and reperfusive time of occluded artery between A and B.Conclutions Part of the cases with cerebral infarction after 6 hours of stroke onset can benefit from intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy?
分 类 号:R743.330.5[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.211