检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡玉辉[1]
出 处:《现代中西医结合杂志》2002年第3期196-197,共2页Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
摘 要:目的 :观察思密达、西沙比利、雷尼替丁联合治疗反流性食管炎的疗效。方法 :将 74例反流性食管炎患者随机分为治疗组及对照组各 37例。治疗组给予思密达、西沙比利、雷尼替丁联合治疗 ;对照组给予西沙比利、雷尼替丁治疗。比较两组疗效。结果 :治疗组治愈 32例 ,显效 3例 ,有效 2例 ,无效 0例 ;对照组治愈 9例 ,显效 5例 ,有效 10例 ,无效 3例。经统计学处理 ,治疗组疗效优于对照组 ,有显著性差异 ( P<0 .0 1)。结论 :思密达、西沙比利、雷尼替丁联合治疗反流性食管炎疗效显著 ,且明显优于西沙比利合雷尼替丁联合治疗的疗效。Objective: It is to observe the effect of smecta, cisapride and ranitidine on reflux esophagitis(RE). Methods: Seventy-four patients with RE were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty-seven patients in treatment group were treated with smecta, cisapride and raniidine. Thirty-seven patients in control group were treated with cisapride and ranitidine. The effects of the two groups were compared. Results: In treatment group, 32 patients were cured, 3 with significant improvement, 2 with improvement and none with no change. In control group, 9 patients were cured, 15 with significant improvement, 10 with improvement and 3 with no change. The effective rate of treatment group was significantly higher than that of control group( P <0.01). Conclusion: The effect of smecta, cisapride and ranitidine on patients with RE is significant and better than that of control group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3