检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江刚[1] 闵华庆[2] 张锦明[2] 黄以乐[1]
机构地区:[1]第一军医大学附属珠江医院耳鼻咽喉科,广州510282 [2]中山医科大学肿瘤防治中心鼻咽癌科
出 处:《中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志》2001年第5期376-379,共4页Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
摘 要:目的 明确诱导性区域动脉灌注化学治疗在局部晚期鼻咽癌 (nasopharyngealcarcinoma,NPC)治疗中的价值。方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究 ,将病理确诊的 12 1例晚期 (III~IV期 )初治NPC患者于放射治疗前随机分成两组 ,6 1例进行区域性动脉灌注化学治疗 (intra arterialchemotherapy,IACT) ,6 0例采用全身化学治疗 (systemicchemotherapy ,SCT) ,对比化学治疗完全缓解率及毒副反应发生情况 ,放射治疗后比较两组的疗效。统计学处理采用卡方检验。结果 IACT组化学治疗的全身性毒副反应发生率较SCT组低 ,口腔炎的发生率较高 (P值分别为 <0 0 5或 <0 0 0 5 )。IACT组有 6例因血管闭塞不能进行第 2疗程的化学治疗。IACT组化学治疗完全缓解率及 5年生存率分别为 2 7 9%(17/ 6 1)和 6 3 9%(39/ 6 1) ,而SCT组分别为 11 7%(7/ 6 0 )和 45 0 %(2 7/ 6 0 ) ,两组相比较均有统计学差异 (P值均 <0 0 5 ) ;两组间无瘤生存率比较 ,差异无显著性 (P >0 0 5 )。结论 以IACT行诱导化学治疗对III~IV期局部晚期NPC更为合理。Objective To define the value of regional intra-arterial induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods 121 locally advanced NPC(stage III~IV) patients confirmed by pathology were randomly divided into two groups before radiation, and the two groups were given two different methods of chemotherapy: regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACT) and systemic chemotherapy (SCT). After radiation the effect of two methods was compared. Results The complete response rates were 27.9% in the IACT and 11.7% in the SCT , and 5 years survival rates were 63.9% in the IACT and 45.0% in the SCT respectively. The differences of two groups were significant. Conclusion IACT is more reasonable than SCT as induction chemotherapy for these locally advanced NPC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.11