检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁新凤[1] 吴林生[1] 沈晓临 吴建梅 王艳丽 LIANG Xinfeng;WU Linshen;SHEN Xiaolin;WU Jianmei;WANG Yanli(Department of Ultrasound,Central Hospital of Huangpu District,Shanghai 200002,China)
机构地区:[1]上海市黄浦区中心医院超声科,上海200002
出 处:《肿瘤影像学》2018年第5期398-401,共4页Oncoradiology
摘 要:目的:回顾性分析乳腺影像报告和数据系统(Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System,BI-RADS)4类乳腺癌的超声图像特征,以提高不典型乳腺癌的超声诊断率。方法:收集5年中随访的138例超声诊断为BI-RADS 4类乳腺癌的患者,均经手术后病理学检查证实,比较超声图像分型与病理分型结果。结果:138例超声诊断的BI-RADS 4类乳腺癌中,4A类59例、4B类28例、4C类51例,与病理分型结果比较差异无统计学意义。4A与4B/4C类型的声像图特征差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:超声波检查对提高早期BI-RADS 4类乳腺癌诊断率有一定的价值。Objective:To analyze the ultrasound features of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)category 4 breast cancer,and to improve the diagnostic accuracy of atypical breast cancer by ultrasound.Methods:A total of 138 cases with ultrasound-diagnosed BI-RADS category 4breast cancer in 5-year follow-up were collected and confirmed by surgery and pathology. The ultrasound classification was compared with pathological results.Results:Among 138 cases of BI-RADS category 4 breast cancer diagnosed by ultrasound,there were 59 classified as 4A,28 as 4B and 51 as 4C.There was no significant difference between ultrasound classification and pathological results.But the ultrasound features between 4A and 4B/4C were significantly different (P<0.05).Conclusion:Ultrasound could improve the diagnosis of early BI-RADS category 4 breast cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117