检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李扬 LI Yang
机构地区:[1]山西省水利水电科学研究院,山西太原030002
出 处:《山西水利科技》2018年第4期4-8,共5页Shanxi Hydrotechnics
摘 要:基于贝叶斯方法对P-Ⅲ分布的参数进行估计时,为解决复杂高维积分问题并降低计算量,采用MCMC方法得到参数样本。结合实例,对MH算法、DR算法和AM算法等3种常用MCMC方法的计算效率进行比较。结果表明,抽样算法的选择对MCMC方法的结果影响较大,而对频率曲线的拟合效果影响很小,与MH算法和DR算法相比,AM算法的收敛速度更快,计算效率更高。During the parameter estimating for P-Ⅲ distribution using Baysian theory,three kinds of MCMC sampling methods including MH algorithm,DR algorithm and AM algorithm were used to obtain the parameter samples of annual maximum flows,and their properties were compared in application.The results show that different sampling method has great influence on the performance of the MCMC method,and the frequency curve fitting effect has less relation to the type of sampling algorithm.Fast in convergence rate,high in computational efficiency and good effects in parameter estimation,AM algorithm was much better than MH and DR algorithm.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.215.209