检察机关审查起诉与监察委调查案件的程序对接问题  

Research on the Connection between the Prosecution Review by theProcuratorate and the Case Investigation by the Supervisory Committee

作　　者：王戬[1] WANG Jian(Law School of East China University of Politics and Law)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海201615

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2018年第6期118-129,172,173,共14页Journal of National Prosecutors College

基　　金：国家社科2016年一般项目"刑事言词证据的危险性及其与刑事错案的关联研究"(16 BFX093);中国法学会2012年课题"检察院侦查监督权改革研究"(CLS(2012)C66)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在案件办理中,无论是从制度安排还是实际操作上,监察委与司法机关之间的协调衔接都涉及诸多方面的内容。其中监察委调查案件到检察院审查起诉阶段,由于以程序流转的视角二者是站在对接的第一端口,其有效对接对案件的进一步处理至关重要。2018年《刑事诉讼法》修正,在与监察委调查案件的对接上,一些程序对接由于两法在制度设置层面的差异,容易造成具体适用上的误读和潜在风险;一些程序对接由于法律规范上的盲点和冲突,容易造成适用上的困惑和现实障碍。检察机关需要站在职能充分发挥和破除既有制度阻碍的视角,重新审视现行刑事诉讼法,并助推相关法律的修改和完善。During the case handling,whether from the institution arrangement or the actual operation, the coordination and connection between the Supervisory Committee and the Judicial Organs are concerned with many aspects.Among them,the process from the case investigation by the Supervisory Committee to the prosecution review by the Procuratorate is extremely important,because it is the first port where the two departments began to connect.Therefore,effective connection during that process is crucial for the further handling of cases.With the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018,when connecting with the case investigation by the Supervisory Committee,some procedures are liable to cause misunderstandings and potential risks in the specific application of the two laws due to the differences in system settings,and some procedures are liable to cause confusion and real obstacles in application due to the blind spots and conflicts in legal norms.In this regard,the procuratorate needs to stand in the perspective of giving full play to their functions and breaking the existing institutional obstacles,as well as re -examine the current criminal procedure law and promote the revision of relevant laws.

关 键 词：调查 审查起诉 对接 程序 监察 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]