学术述评之我见——读《〈文选〉研究百年述评》之二  

On Academic Review——Opinions about A Review on the Hundred Years Studies of Wen-xuan

作　　者：张文东[1] 李乃龙[1] ZHANG Wen-dong;LI Nai-long(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541004,China)

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第6期138-144,共7页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：学术述评承担着展现学术研究状况、推进学术研究进程的重大作用。《文学评论》以其影响力更是在学界起到垂范后学的作用,而其所刊《〈文选〉研究百年述评》一文,作为一篇学术述评,在对象界定、文献搜集、叙述方法、评论判断等方面均存在严重不足,如不检讨,恐诖误后学。今特从学术述评写作的角度对其以上诸方面出现的种种问题提出意见。Academic review plays an important role in displaying the status and promoting the process of academic research.Especially,Literary Review becomes an exemplary model in the academic circles with its great influence.However,A Review on the Hundred Years Studies of Wen-xuan,as an academic review,has serious deficiencies in such aspects as object definition,literature search,narrative methods and commentary.This review should be analyzed and rectified;otherwise,it will mislead future researchers.Therefore,this paper puts forward suggestions to deal with the above deficiencies from the writing perspective of academic review.

关 键 词：《文选》 学术 述评 意见 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]