论刑事法官庭外调查的失范与规范  

On the Anomie and Norm of the Criminal Judge's Investigation Out-of-Court

作　　者：李锟 LI Kun(Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization,Jilin University,Changehun,Jilin,130012)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学司法文明协同创新中心,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第5期49-57,共9页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"非法证据排除规则的实践困境及其立法完善研究"(15BFX093);国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心成果

摘　　要：我国刑事法官庭外调查的初衷在于补充庭审调查,辅助法官认定案件事实。实践中的庭外调查呈现为调查程序行政化、调查言词证据普遍化以及事实调查片面化等运行失范和权力扩张问题,弱化了庭审调查的主导性,加剧了庭审形式化。失范的庭外调查与我国职权主义诉讼传统、以书面为主的审理模式及庭审对证据能力的审查不严有关。未来的庭外调查应当进行诉讼化改造,保证控辩双方的知情权和质证权,严格遵循法定调查方法,重点审查证据证明力。对涉密证据要进行全面审查,调查人员应当遵守保密原则。The original intention of the investigation out-of-court in China is to assist the judge to investigate the facts. In practice, however, such investigations tend to be administratively expanded, testify commonly and be onesided in fact-finding operations, which has weakened the competency of the evidence in the trial and made the trial more formalized. The illegal investigation is related to China’s inquisitorial system, the mode of"documentary evidence Centrism"trial and the lack of examination to the competency of the evidence in the court. In the future, such investigation should stress the structure of litigation, guarantee the right to know and confrontation which owe to both the accuser and the defender, and try to investigate the real evidence and review the weight of evidence. Besides, the one participating in the investigation of the technical evidence should observe the principle of confidentiality, and conduct a comprehensive investigation.

关 键 词：庭外调查 庭审实质化 诉讼化构造 证据能力 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]