检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪苹 孙志强 王宇涛[2] 李韶山[2] WANG Ping;SUN Zhiqiang;WANG Yutao;LI Shaoshan(Best Justical Testing Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 511400,China;School of Life Science,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 511400,China)
机构地区:[1]广州京诚检测技术有限公司,广东广州511400 [2]华南师范大学生命科学学院,广东广州511400
出 处:《环境科学与技术》2018年第12期13-19,共7页Environmental Science & Technology
基 金:2017年广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目资助(2017A030310168)
摘 要:文章研究了纳米ZnO对小球藻和羊角月牙藻的毒性效应和生物富集与转化效率。纳米ZnO对小球藻和羊角月牙藻细胞的96 h-EC_(50)值分别为17.11和2.26 mg/L。彗星电泳图中拖尾的DNA反映出纳米ZnO诱导了小球藻和羊角月牙藻细胞的DNA损伤,产生了基因毒性。小球藻和羊角月牙藻对培养基中总锌的去除率随时间的延长而增加,在处理96 h后其去除效率可分别达到60.8%和24.1%。双因素方差分析结果表明(P<0.001),小球藻对纳米ZnO具有更强的富集效率。The toxicity, removal and bioaccumulation of zinc oxide nanoparticles(nano-ZnO) by two unicellular green microalgal species, Chlorella vulgaris and Selenastrum capricornutum, were studied. The cytotoxicity of nano-ZnO was concentration-, species-and time-dependent. The 96 h-EC50 values of nano-ZnO to C. vulgaris and S. capricornutum were17.11 and 2.26 mg/L, respectively, suggesting that C. vulgaris was much more tolerant to nano-ZnO than S. capricornutum.The unclear tail in comet assay images reflected that nano-ZnO induced DNA damage in both microalgae. Two-way ANOVA results showed that C. vulgaris had higher removal efficiencies and uptake ability of nano-ZnO than S. capricornutum(P<0.001). Further research is needed to understand the toxicity mechanism of nano-ZnO and the trophic transfer effect of nano-ZnO through the food chain.
分 类 号:X172[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.229.189