检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭海青[1] 张竞丹 Haiqing Peng;Jingdan Zhang(Beijign Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081)
机构地区:[1]北京理工大学,北京100081
出 处:《警学研究》2018年第5期68-72,共5页Police Science Research
摘 要:认罪认罚从宽制度价值取向争议的解决,对于认罪认罚从宽制度的理论体系、制度规范与有效实施非常关键。对认罪认罚从宽制度的价值取向从历史、规范、理论与实证等多重视角全面展开分析,发现认罪认罚从宽制度的价值取向是权利保障和诉讼效率兼而有之非厚此薄彼。认罪认罚从宽制度中核心价值取向的争议暴露了刑事诉讼基础理论之于刑事诉讼实践的落后,应以认罪认罚从宽制度实践的发展为契机,积极推动基础理论的发展,推动学科建设,进而从更高级意义上指导立法与司法实践。Settling the disputes of the core value of the Lenient Punishment for the Pleading Guilty System is crucial for its system,institutional norms and effective implementation.The value orientation should be comprehensively analyzed from multiple perspectives such as history,norms, theory and empirical evidence to found the combination of rights protection and litigation efficiency.The dispute reveals the backwardness of the basic theory of criminal procedure in the practice,it should take the opportunity of the development of pleading guilty system practice,to actively promote the basic theory and the discipline construction,then guide the legislative and judicial practice in a higher level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222