《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》的生态法治蕴涵及实践价值  

The Implication and Practical Value of Ecological Rule of Law in Debate on Forest Theft Law

作　　者：陈真亮[1] Chen Zhenliang(School of Law,Zhejiang A&F University,Hangzhou 311300)

机构地区：[1]浙江农林大学法学院

出　　处：《林业经济》2018年第12期89-94,共6页Forestry Economics

基　　金：2016年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“生态文明建设与环境法的体系化发展”(编号:16jj0820012);浙江农林大学“青年英才”人才项目“健康权优位的环境法回应及制度构建”(编号:2034100001)

摘　　要：马克思《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》一文既有对国家制定法与林业习惯法等法律多元现象的形式法治之审视,也有对人文主义价值观、习惯权利、林木所有权、林业法系统化等方面的实质法治之考量,体现了自然法意义上的“实践理性”的生态法哲学思辨。尤其是马克思关于森林立法的“体系化观”,其主张立法应具有逻辑自洽的体系,要注重内部体系和外部体系的沟通与协调。这实际上蕴含了科学立法、民主立法、依法立法等法治思想,蕴含着国家应履行立“良法”“公正法”的环境义务的启示意义与实践指向。Marx’s Debate on Forest Theft Law not only examines the pluralistic legal phenomena such as national statute law and forestry customary law, but also considers the substantive rule of law in terms of humanistic values,customary rights, forest ownership and systematization of forestry law, which embodies the philosophical thinking of ecological law in the sense of"practical rationality"in natural law. In particular, Marx’s"systematic view"on forest legislation advocates that legislation should have a logical and self-consistent system, and pay attention to the communication and coordination between internal and external systems. In fact, it contains such ideas as scientific legislation, democratic legislation and legislation according to law, and it also contains the enlightenment and practical direction that the state should fulfill its environmental obligations of establishing"good law"and"fair law".

关 键 词：生态文明法治 习惯权利 习惯法 体系化 国家义务 

分 类 号：F307.2[经济管理—产业经济]