“生产教育”向何处去?——1930年代教育界关于“以农立国”与“以工立国”的争论  

The Orientation of the Productive Education——The Debate on China's Development Path of Build a Country Based on Agriculture or Build a Country in Chinese Education Scholars in 1930s

作　　者：周楠 ZHOU Nan(Department of History,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学历史学系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2018年第6期54-59,共6页Qilu Journal

摘　　要：20世纪20至40年代,中国思想界关于中国发展道路"以农立国"与"以工立国"发生激烈争论,影响深远。这场争论在教育领域同样有所反应,集中体现在1930年代教育界关于生产教育的讨论中。围绕生产教育中"生产"究竟以农业生产还是工业生产为主,教育界先后形成了"农业为主"论、"工业为主"论、"农工并重"论等三派观点。表面上看,"农工并重"论获得一致认可;就实质而言,应是"工业为主"论占据优势。回顾这场教育领域的争论,可以为认识中国发展道路"以农立国"与"以工立国"之争提供更为丰富的历史视角。The Chinese ideological circles have a heated debate on China's development path of build a country based on agriculture or build a country based on industry between 1920 to 1940s.The debate is also react in the field of education,concentrated in the discussion of the productive education in the 1930s.There were three views on the production is based on agricultural production or industrial production,include mainly agriculture development,mainly industrial development,both industrial development and agricultural development are equal.The last view was recognized by most people on the surface,and in fact the second view gained more recognition.We can provide a richer historical perspective on China s development path of build a country based on agriculture or build a country based on industry through the debate in the field of education.

关 键 词：中国教育界 以农立国 以工立国 生产教育 

分 类 号：G71[文化科学—职业技术教育学]