检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹正飞 王青青 关慧娟 冯翠娟[1] CAO Zheng-fei;WANG Qing-qing;GUAN Hui-juan;FENG Cui-juan(Second Department of Orthodontics,Hospital of Stomatology ,China Medical University,Shenyang 110002,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属口腔医院正畸二科,辽宁沈阳110002
出 处:《中国实用口腔科杂志》2019年第1期36-41,共6页Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
基 金:辽宁省自然科学基金(20170541013)
摘 要:目的对比较安氏Ⅱ类1分类与安氏Ⅰ类错畸形患者牙弓宽度的文献进行系统评价,探讨安氏Ⅱ类1分类错畸形患者牙弓宽度的特点。方法计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane数据库、中国知网(CNKI),收集国内外所有已发表的比较安氏Ⅱ类1分类与安氏Ⅰ类错畸形牙弓宽度的中英文相关文献,检索时间为2000-01-01至2018-03-30,对文献语言没有限制。由2名研究员根据纳入和排除标准进行文献筛选,之后采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果初步检索后得到955篇文献,经筛选后最终纳入8篇文献进行分析。Meta分析结果显示,安氏Ⅱ类1分类错畸形患者的上颌前、中、后段宽度均小于安氏Ⅰ类患者,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);而两类错畸形患者的下颌前、中、后段牙弓宽度差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论安氏Ⅱ类1分类上颌牙弓宽度小于安氏Ⅰ类,而下颌牙弓宽度与安氏Ⅰ类相比无差异。因此,安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者在正畸治疗过程中应考虑上颌扩弓治疗,注意上下颌牙列弓形的匹配。Objective To systematically evaluate the literature comparing dental arch width between Class Ⅱ Division1 and Class Ⅰ malocclusion patients and investigate the characteristics of dental arch width of Class Ⅱ Division 1 malocclusion. Methods The PubMed,Embase,Cochrane database and CNKI were searched to collect all published Chinese and English related literature which compared dental arch width between Class Ⅱ Division 1 and Class Ⅰ malocclusion patients. The retrieval time was from January 1,2000 to March 30,2018. There was no limit on the language of literature. Two researchers screened the literature according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria. And the data analysis was made by RevMan5.3. Results Totally 955 articles were obtained after initial searching,and finally 8 articles were selected for the meta analysis. The meta analysis results showed that the width of the maxillary anterior,middle and posterior segments of the Class Ⅱ Division 1 was smaller than that of Class Ⅰ,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the width of the anterior,middle and posterior segments of mandibular arch between the two malocclusions(P >0.05). Conclusion The maxillary arch width of Class Ⅱ Division 1was smaller than that of Class Ⅰ,while the width of mandibular arch was similar. Therefore,during the orthodontic treatment,maxillary expansion and the matching of the maxillary and mandibular arches should be considered in Class Ⅱ Division 1 patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43