检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张惠美[1] 徐华军[2] 毛新峰[1] 朱彦[3] ZHANG Huimei;XU Huajun;MAO Xinfeng(Department of Radiology,Huzhou Central Hospital,Huzhou,313000,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]浙江省湖州市中心医院放射科,313000 [2]浙江省湖州市中心医院超声科,313000 [3]江苏大学附属医院放射科,镇江212000
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2018年第12期1994-1997,共4页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的探讨数字乳腺断层摄影(DBT)与超声弹性成像(UE)联合在乳腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析本院350例乳腺结节的DBT、UE及MRI影像学资料,与手术病理结果为金标准,比较DBT和UE联合与MRI在诊断敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率上的差别。结果 DBT、UE与MRI三者在诊断敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及正确率上差别明显(P﹤0.05),将DBT和UE联合后与MRI比较则诊断敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及正确率上分别为97.7%vs 98.8%、82.8%vs 74.2%、94.0%vs91.4%、96.3%vs 95.8%、93.7%vs 92.3%,两者差别不大(P﹥0.05)。结论 DBT和UE联合经济、便捷,可靠性高,可有效提高乳腺癌诊断效能。Objective The aim of this study was to explore thediagnostic value ofdigital breast tomosynthesis(DBT)combined with elastography in the breast cancer.Methods 350 patients with breast nodules confirmed by pathology underwent DBT,ultrasound elastography and MRI,the imaging characteristics were analyzed,and the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and coincidence rate of MRI and digital breast tomosynthesis combined with elastography were compared.Results There were significant statistical differences(P﹤0.05) between the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and coincidence rates of these three imaging exams,but there was no statistical significance(P﹥0.05) between MRI and digital breast tomosynthesis combined with elastography(97.7% vs 98.8%,82.8% vs 74.2%,94.0% vs 91.4%,96.3% vs 95.8%,93.7% vs 92.3%).Conclusion The combination of digital breast tomosynthesis and elastography was more economical,convenient and feasible,the diagnostic value of breast cancer could be effectively improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38