宅基地使用权收回事由类型化及立法回应  

The Classification of Withdrawal Causes of Right for Rural Homestead and Its Legislative Response

作　　者：耿卓[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学土地法制研究院,广东广州510420

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2019年第1期180-191,共12页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：农业农村部软科学研究项目(2018113)"宅基地三权分置法律问题研究";广州市社科联2017年度(17QNXR23)"羊城青年学人"资助研究项目"广州城市更新的土地法制保障";广东外语外贸大学校级科研项目(231-X5217354)"城市更新中的建设用地法律问题研究"

摘　　要：宅基地使用权收回事由在收回制度乃至整个宅基地使用权制度中都处于关键地位。现行法律规定与实践比较混乱,有待理顺。宅基地使用权收回可分为单方收回和协商收回。前者又可以根据是否涉及公共利益分为公共利益收回和非公共利益收回两类。非公共利益收回又可以分为因违反法律规定而收回如违反宅基地用途而收回,因集体成员身份丧失而收回等类型。民法典物权编与《土地管理法》应分工协调,对宅基地使用权收回事由作出具体规定,以统一法制。The causes of withdrawal is the key in the withdrawal system and even in system of right for rural homestead. The current legal provisions and practice are confusing and need to be sorted out. Causes of withdrawal right for rural homestead can be divided into two categories: public interest withdrawal and non-public interest withdrawal. Non-public-interest causes can be divided into following categories: violation of purpose,loss of rural collective membership,long-term idle. The Property Right title of Civil Code should be coordinated with the Land Administration Law,and the right for homestead should be made by specific provisions to unify legal system.

关 键 词：宅基地使用权 收回事由 公共利益收回 非公共利益收回 

分 类 号：D912.3[政治法律—法学]