对“构建民族教育研究的中国话语”的学习与商榷(笔谈)  

Learning and Deliberation of“The Construction of Chinese Discourse of Research on Ethnic Education”(Written Conversations)

作　　者：钱民辉[1] 薛芳璿 张阳阳[1] QIAN Min-hui;XUE Fang-xuan;ZHANG Yang-yang(Department of Sociology,Peking University,Beijing 100871)

机构地区：[1]北京大学社会学系,北京100871

出　　处：《民族教育研究》2018年第6期5-9,共5页Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"民族教育与文化认同--基于多元文化教育的理念与实践"(项目编号:11JJD840013)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：《民族教育研究》2018年第3期刊发了关于"构建民族教育研究的中国话语"的一组笔谈,袁同凯、丁月牙、巴战龙和陈学金四位学者针对北京大学社会学系钱民辉提出的"意识三态观"进行了讨论,各自的议题是:"意识三态观"能否与现行诸理论进行对话;"意识三态观"能否作为民族教育研究范式的一个补充;"意识三态观"不应从空间(宏观、中观、微观)而应从场域(政治、文化、心理)上提出问题和解释问题;"意识三态观"应增加历时性演化视野,等等。对此,钱民辉、薛芳璿、张阳阳三位作者读后对"笔谈"有不同的看法,故也以笔谈的形式进行讨论和商榷。In the third issue 2018 of Ethnic Education Study, Yuan Tongkai, Ding Yueya, Ba Zhanlong and Chen Xuejin four scholars published a set of written conversations about "The Construction of Chinese Discourse of Research on Ethnic Education", discussing "the three ideology-based ideas" proposed by Professor Qian Minhui. Their respective topics are: whether it is possible to make a dialogue between "the three ideology-based ideas" and the current theories;whether "the three ideology-based ideas" can be used as a supplement to the paradigm of ethnic education research;"the three ideology-based ideas" should propose and explain questions in the perspective of field(politics, culture and psychology) instead of the perspective of space(macro, medium and micro views);and "the three ideology-based ideas" should use diachronic evolution perspective. In this paper, the three writers express different views and make a discussion and deliberation also in the form of written conversations.

关 键 词：“意识三态观” 民族教育研究 中国话语 

分 类 号：G750[文化科学—教育学]