也论遗赠能否直接引起物权变动  

Also on Whether the Bequest Can Directly Cause the Change of Property Rights

作　　者：汪志刚[1] 王小兵 WANG Zhi-gang;WANG Xiao-bing(Jiangxi University of Finance and Economies,Nanehang 330032;Nanchang City Construction Group Co.,Ltd.,Nanchang 330013,China)

机构地区：[1]江西财经大学法学院,江西南昌330032 [2]南昌城建集团有限公司,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《江西财经大学学报》2019年第1期123-131,共9页Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics

摘　　要：对于《物权法》第29条直接赋予遗赠以物权变动效力的做法,否定论所提出的各项批评值得商榷。在现行法之下,直接赋予遗赠以物权变动效力并不会造成明显的体系冲突和给交易安全带来危害,反倒可以更好地贯彻因遗赠而生的物权变动原则上应与因遗产分割而生的物权变动保持规则适用上的一致性的法理,因而是值得肯定的。在因继承而生的物权变动已被解释为溯及于被继承人死亡时开始的情况下,对于《物权法》第29条所规定的"受遗赠开始时"也应做溯及主义的解释,即因受遗赠而取得的物权应被解释为溯及于遗赠人死亡时开始生效。Article 29 of the Property Law directly grants bequests the effect of property rights changes,on this practice,those with negative opinions have put forward various criticisms,but these criticisms are debatable.Under the current law,to directly grant a bequest the effect of property rights change will not cause significant system conflicts and bring harm to transaction safety,instead,it can better implement the legal principle that the changes of property rights due to bequests should be in line with the changes of the property rights due to the legacy division for the application of the same rules,thus it is worthy of recognition.Since the changes of property rights due to inheritance has been interpreted as beginning with the death of the decedent,the retrospective interpretation of the "beginning of the bequest" as stipulated in Article 29 of the Property Law shall also be the same,that is,the property right obtained from the bequest should be interpreted as having come into effect from the death of the legator.

关 键 词：遗赠 物权变动 继承 遗赠合意 溯及主义 

分 类 号：F521[经济管理—产业经济]