GBR植骨相较于自体骨移植远期稳定性的优势  

Advantages of long-term stability of guided bone regeneration compared with autogenous bone grafting

作　　者：郝柯屹 田杰华[1] 吕鸣樾 刘焱萍 魏冬豪 张宇[1] HAO Keyi;TIAN Jiehua;LYU Mingyue;LIU Yanping;WEI Donghao;ZHANG Yu(Department of lmplantology,Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学口腔医院种植科,北京100081

出　　处：《口腔医学》2019年第1期60-62,共3页Stomatology

摘　　要：患者缺牙后骨吸收所导致的牙槽骨骨量不足已经成为了口腔种植中较为常见的问题。自体骨移植技术和引导性骨再生技术都在解决种植患者骨量不足中具有良好的效果,二者都在种植骨增量中得到了广泛的应用。然而,骨增量技术中的骨改建和长期骨稳定性一直被视作影响口腔种植成功率的重要因素。两项技术虽然都在不同程度上进行了牙槽骨增量,但二者骨量能否维持长期稳定逐渐得到了更多关注。本文将对引导性骨再生技术相较于自体骨移植在远期稳定性方面的部分优势作一简要综述。Insufficient alveolar bone volume caused by bone resorption has become a common problem for implant placement. Autogenous bone grafting and guided bone regeneration technique have shown good effects on the bone augmentation. These techniques have been widely used for overcoming hard-tissue defects in preprosthetic surgeries. However,the bone remodeling and the augmented bone stability are both considered to be the important factors of the success of the dental implant treatment. The volumetric extents of these two methods are clear,but their long-term stability of the bone blocks gradually attracts more attention. This review aims at demonstrating the advantages of guided bone regeneration compared with autogenous bone grafting in terms of long-term stability.

关 键 词：口腔种植 骨增量 引导性骨再生 自体骨移植 

分 类 号：R783.4[医药卫生—口腔医学]