网络平台用户协议中格式条款司法规制之实证研究  

Empirical Study on Judicial Regulation of Format Terms in Network Platform User Agreement

作　　者：胡安琪[1] 李明发[1] HU An-qi;LIMing-fa

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2019年第1期53-62,共10页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：以实证案例为样本,可以发现格式条款的形式性规制在网络平台用户协议中存在不足,无法有效过滤不公平的格式条款,呈现裁判冲突、司法适用混乱的现象。这主要由网络合同的特殊性、实务对理论掌握的不足所导致,亟须从传统信息规制转向以内容规制为中心。在内容规制的范式选择上,应以诚实信用原则作为根本性审查规范构建抽象标准,具体列举不公平格式条款的类型,从而构建我国网络平台用户协议中格式条款的黑名单与灰名单。在内容审查的双重体系下,遵循从具体到抽象的审查顺序,使理论充分服务于司法实践。Taking the empirical cases as samples,it is found that the formal regulation of format clause is insufficient in the user agreement of the network platform,and it is unable to effectively filter the unfair format standardized terms,and the conflicts of judgments and chaos of judicial application are presented.This is mainly caused by the particularity of the electronic contract,the lack of theoretical control,and the behavioral economics. It is necessary to shift from the traditional information regulation to the content control. In the paradigm selection of content regulation,the principle of good faith is used as the basic review norm to construct abstract standards,and the types of unfair format clauses are specifically listed to construct the blacklist and grey list of the format clauses in the user agreement of China’s network platform.Under the dual system of content review,the theory fully serves the judicial practice by following the order of review from concrete to abstract.

关 键 词：格式条款 网络平台用户协议 形式性规制 内容规制 

分 类 号：DF418[政治法律—经济法学]