我国未遂犯处罚范围的立法困境与应然选择——以比较法为视角  

The legislative Dilemma and Due Choice of the Scope of Punishment for Attempted Crime in China——From the Perspective of Comparative Law

作　　者：李永升[1] 安军宇 LIYong-sheng;ANJun-yu

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学 [2]西南政法大学金融刑法研究中心

出　　处：《北方法学》2019年第1期72-87,共16页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目"刑罚退出机制的价值确立与实践运行"(17XFX009)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：《刑法》第23条第2款所规定的未遂犯处罚范围过于宽泛,既未明确列举何种未遂犯具有可罚性,也未提供未遂犯应予处罚的评价标准,这导致司法实践对未遂犯的处罚较为混乱,并且该问题在我国学界也未引起重视。解决未遂犯处罚范围过于宽泛的问题,关键在于修改立法模式,即以列举型立法模式将应受刑罚处罚的未遂犯明文规定于刑法分则之中。在衡量何种未遂犯值得刑罚处罚时,既要考虑个罪保护法益的高低,又要兼顾个罪一般预防必要性的大小;既要借鉴国外关于未遂犯处罚的立法经验,又要立足于我国国情以回应社会需求。The scope of punishment for attempted crime stipulated in the Penal Code Article 23,Paragraph 2 is too broad. It neither clearly enumerates which attempted crime is punishable nor provides the evaluation criteria for the punishment of attempted crime. Moreover,this issue has not attracted much attention in the academic circles of our country,which leads to the confusion of punishment for attempted crime in judicial practice. The key to solve the problem of too wide punishment for attempted crime is to modify the legislative mode. The enumerated legislative mode should be expressly stipulated in the Penal Code. When judging what kind of attempted crime deserves punishment,people should consider not only the level of protecting legal interests of a crime,but also the necessity of general prevention of a crime. We should learn from foreign legislative experience on the punishment of attempted crime,and also base ourselves on our national conditions to respond to social needs.

关 键 词：未遂犯 处罚范围 立法模式 刑法客观主义 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]