调查性侦查措施的类型化界定与侦查监督机制  

The Definition and Investigation Supervision Mechanism of Evidence-Gathering Investigation Measures

作　　者：马方[1,2] 吴桐[3] MA Fang;WU Tong(School of Criminal Investigation,Southwest University of Political Science and Law Chongqing 401120;NationalLaw Supervision Research Center Chongqing 401120;National Drug Problem Management Research Center (Drug Crime and Strategy Research Center)Chongqing 401120)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学刑事侦查学院,重庆401120 [2]西南政法大学国家监察法治研究中心,重庆401120 [3]西南政法大学国家毒品问题治理研究中心(毒品犯罪与对策研究中心),重庆401120

出　　处：《中国刑警学院学报》2018年第6期33-38,共6页Journal of Criminal Investigation Police University of China

基　　金：2018年重庆市研究生科研创新项目(编号:CYS18181);西南政法大学国家毒品问题治理研究中心项目(编号:DR(2018)Y013)

摘　　要：调查性侦查措施在行为种类上的复杂性,使得仅依靠抽象性的概念界定难以周延其实践样态,应借助类型化思维予以进一步解读,形成概念—类型的二阶构造。在具体分类上应以权利客体为基础,辅之以侵权行为方式、权利主体自愿性考察,将调查性侦查措施分为立案前的初查措施及立案后的非直接限制人身、财产权利的措施,并构建相应的侦查监督机制。通过确立同步介入模式、事前审查模式、事后救济模式形成完整的侦查监督体制,以期能够针对于不同类型的调查性侦查措施,施以层级化的侦查监督控制。The complexity of the types of the evidence-gathering investigation measurement makes it difficult to define the practical situations by merely understanding abstract concepts. It should be further interpreted by the means of typological thinking abilities to form two systems of concepts and types.The specific classification should be based on the object of the right, supplemented by the way of infringement and the voluntary inspection of the subject of the right. Evidence-gathering investigation measures can be divided into the initial investigation measures before filing a case and the indirect restriction measures after filing the case. By combining synchronous intervention, pre-examination and post compensation, a complete system of investigation supervision can be formed.

关 键 词：经济犯罪侦查 调查性侦查措施 侦查监督 类型化 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]