儒道分野:胡渭对图书易学的批判  

Separating Daoism from Confucianism:Hu Wei's Criticism of the He tu and Luo shu-based Changes Scholarship

作　　者：姜广辉[1] 杨丹 JIANG Guang-hui;YANG Dan(Yuelu Academy,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《周易研究》2018年第6期17-25,共9页Studies of Zhouyi

基　　金：国家社会科学基金2010年重大招标项目:"中国经学史"(10&ZD058)

摘　　要：胡渭的《易图明辨》是考辨图书易学的集大成著作。以往关于《周易》图书之学是否属于易学正统的问题,只要指出对方有道家思想,那便等于宣判对方为异端。此书的好处在于,它并不是简单指出图书易学属于道家之学,而是具体指出它属于道家内丹养生学,并提出以修炼内丹养生为宗旨的图书易学,与文王、周公、孔子以来的圣人之《易》,"离之则双美,合之则两伤"。这一立场便使得胡渭对图书易学的论断较时贤高出一筹。The Yitu mingbian 易图明辨(A Clarifying Critique of the Illustrations Associated with the Changes)was Hu Wei’s(1633-1714)magnum opus which offers a detailed clarification and analysis of the Changes scholarship based on the He tu(Yellow River Chart)and Luo shu(Luo River Diagram).Before the time of Hu Wei,with respect to the issue of whether the Changes scholarship based on the He tu and Luo shu could be attributed to orthodoxy or not,if one could find evidence of Daoist thought in it,it would be judged as heresy.The advantage of this book lies in that it did not simply point out that the tu shu zhi xue(He tu and Luo shu-based learning)belongs to Daoism;also,it specifically claimed that it was attributed to the internal alchemy refinery school in Daoism.In addition,this book contended that if the tu shu zhi xue,which aims to practice internal alchemy refinery to prolong life,was separated from the Changes composed by the sages of King Wen(1152-1056BCE),Duke Zhou,and Confucius(551-479BCE),it would be better for both;otherwise,it would be harmful to both.This standpoint shows that Hu Wei’s view was more insightful than those of his contemporary scholars.

关 键 词：胡渭 《易图明辨》 图书易学 道家内丹养生学 

分 类 号：B249.9[哲学宗教—中国哲学]