检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱雪松[1] 代禹斌 陈琳琳 方胜 Qian Xuesong
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学经济学院,430074 [2]中山大学国际金融学院,519082
出 处:《会计研究》2019年第1期72-78,共7页Accounting Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目"担保物权制度改革对企业负债融资的影响及经济后果:基于<物权法>自然实验的‘法与金融’研究"(71872067)的阶段性成果
摘 要:本文以《物权法》出台为自然实验,运用双重差分法考察担保物权制度改革如何影响企业现金持有。实证结果表明,《物权法》出台后,与固定资产占比较高企业相比,固定资产占比较低企业的现金持有水平显著下降。进一步地,三重差分检验结果表明,与融资约束较小企业相比,法律改革对融资约束较大企业现金持有的降低作用更显著。这揭示出,以扩大担保财产范围、完善担保物权设定实现程序为主要内容的担保物权制度改革缓解了企业融资约束,从而降低了企业基于预防性动机的现金持有。本文揭示出法律制度环境是影响企业现金持有的重要因素,同时利用法律改革引致融资约束冲击的差异性识别出企业的现金持有动机,这对理解我国企业流动性管理有重要启示意义。Using the difference-in-differences method,this paper considers how firms' cash holding responds to the security interest reform which is induced exogenously by the Property Law enactment in China in 2007.We find that this reform led to a significant decrease of cash holding.And these effects are more pronounced for firms that have a lower proportion of fixed assets.Moreover,the triple-differences tests based on financial constraints indicate that the larger financial constraints firms experienced a larger decrease in cash holding.These empirical results reveal that enlarging the collateral menu and lowering the transaction cost of secured lending relieve firms'financial constraints,then bring down the precautionary motive cash which firms hoard to seize future investment opportunities.This paper reveals that the legal institutions play an important role in determining firms'cash holding,and identifies the precautionary motivation of cash holding.These findings can help to understand firms'liquidity management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.232.226