检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院口腔科,510080 [2]广东省江门市口腔医院
出 处:《华西口腔医学杂志》2002年第2期131-133,共3页West China Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的 :评价钛金属烤瓷修复体的临床性能。方法 :将 87例患者分为两组 ,试验组 4 2例患者制作钛金属烤瓷修复体 5 9件 ;对照组 4 5例患者制作镍铬合金烤瓷修复体 6 7件。修复完成时和完成后 1月、18月随访 ,检查修复体颜色、颈缘变色、菌斑指数、牙龈指数、颈缘适合性 5项指标和瓷损坏。结果 :两组前 5项检查指标的比较无统计学差异 ,也均无瓷损坏。结论Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the titanium metal porcelain restoration. Methods:The cases in this evaluation were divided into two groups. The experimental group consisted of 42 cases restored with the titanium metal porcelain restoration; the other 45 cases restored with Ni_Cr alloy porcelain restoration served as the control. The clinical performance of these restorations was observed at 1_month and 18_month follow_up. The evaluator examined the restoration for shade, marginal color, marginal fit, plaque index, gingival index, and porcelain defect.Results:For the shade, 92.8% of the cases in the experimental group were judged as satisfactory at 1_month and 18_month visit, whereas 91.1% in the control were evaluated similarly at the same visit. There was the marginal discoloration of 4 cases in the experimental group. But there was the marginal discoloration of 5~7 cases in the control. There were no significant difference in shade, marginal color, marginal fit, PLI and GI between the two groups .The cracking and chipping and separation of porcelain were not occurred. Conclusion:The titanium metal porcelain restoration should be used for the clinical application compared with the Ni_Cr alloy porcelain restoration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28