检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南省常德市卫生学校,415000 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2002年第2期126-127,共2页Chinese Journal of School Health
摘 要:目的 探讨青少年女生个体营养状况评价方法。方法 用整群抽样方法抽取某校一~三年级 8个班 41 1名 1 5~ 1 8岁女生为样本 ,测定每人身高、体重 ;分别采用Broca、改良Broca、平田、理想、回归体重比法 ,BMI(1 )与BMI(2 )法评定每人营养等级 ,描述各法评价的消瘦、偏瘦、正常、超重、肥胖 5级频率 ,并分析其与实际符合程度 ;用 χ2 检验方法比较各法评价结果有无差别。结果 BMI(2 )法评价的前述 5级频率依次分别为 2 .92 %、2 .1 9%、86 .37%、3 .65 %、4.87% ,较符合我国青少年个体营养状况的实际情况 ;各方法评价结果的 χ2 检验 ,χ2 值为 764 .68,P <0 .0 0 1 ,差异有非常显著意义。结论 BMI(2 )Objective To explore the methods for evaluating nutritional status of female teenager individuals.Methods A cluster sample of 411 first- to third-grade female students belonged to 8 classes, aged 15~18 years, was drawn from a school. Their height and weight were determined, and they were classified according to seven methods of evaluating nutritional status. The constituent ratios of slender, lean, normal, overweight and fat were calculated, and the validity of evaluation seven methods was analyzed. The differences in the evaluation results of seven methods were analyzed by Chi-squared test. Results The constituent ratios of slender, lean, normal, overweight and fat evaluated by BMI (2) were 2.92%. 2.19%, 86.37%, 3. 65% and 4.87% respectively, the result is in accordance to the practical nutritional status of Chinese female teenager individuals. The differences in the evaluation results of seven methods were significant (χ 2=764.68, P<0. 01).Conclusions BMI (2) is an ideal evaluation method.
分 类 号:R195.2[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117