检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《上海环境科学》2002年第2期97-100,共4页Shanghai Environmental Sciences
摘 要:以上海市江桥和闸北2座生活垃圾焚烧厂建设项目为例,采用指标计算法对这2家在不同选址区的建设项目环境经济损益进行了分析。结果表明:江桥生活垃圾焚烧厂项目具有较好的环境经济效益,其环保年净效益为670.69万元,效费比达到1.10。闸北生活垃圾焚烧厂项目的环保年净效益为-764.48万元,效费比为0.64,说明其环境污染控制方案存在明显的不经济性。江桥生活垃圾焚烧厂已投入建设。指标法为2个项目的环境经济损益分析提供了货币量化。In this paper selecting Jiangqiao domestic refuse incineration plant and Zhabei domestic refuse incineration plant in Shanghai as examples, analyzing and studying the environmental economic cost-benefit in different areas by adopting index computing method. Static analysis results showed that the annual net benefit of environmental protection of Jinangqiao domestic refuse incineration plant was 6,706,900 yuan (RMB) and the benefit-cost ratio was 1.10.The annual net benefit of environmental protection of Zhabei domestic refuse incineration plant was - 7,644,800 yuan (RMB) and the benefit-cost ratio was 0.64, which indicated that the construction investment of the project is unreasonable from the view of environmental economy. According to the assessment results mentioned above, Jiangqiao domestic refuse incineration plant was being constructed. Index computing method provided money quantification base for environmental economic cost-benefit analysis of these two domestic refuse incineration plants.
关 键 词:指标计算法 环境经济损益 指标计算法 环保年净效益 环保效费比
分 类 号:X196[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28