检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院口腔科,副主任医师北京100853
出 处:《口腔颌面修复学杂志》2002年第2期85-87,共3页Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics
摘 要:目的:观察56例老年人磨牙根折的修复及疗效。方法:采用牙齿半切术,切除56例患牙根折侧冠根部分,余留冠根部分分别以全冠(30例)和固定桥(26例)修复。结果:修复治疗后12~24个月复查,疗效为优45例、良10 例、差1例,两种修复类型间无明显差异。结论:使用牙体半切术结合不同的固定修复方法,可有效地保留老年人磨牙根折的患牙。Objective: To observe 56 cases of the dental defect restoring and its curative effect of the molar rootfracture in the seniors. Methods: There were 56 cases of the senior's molar root fracture teeth, every affected section ofthem as extracted by the hemisection, the other section of them were restored by both complete crown restoration (30cases) and fixed bridge restoration (26 cases). Results: After 12~24 months, the first curative effect is 45 cases, the secondcurative effect is 10 cases, the third curative effect is 1 case. There were no evident differences between such two restorations.Conclusions: The molar root fracture teeth of the seniors could be effectively remained by hemisection and different fixedrestorations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117