建立我国刑事判例制度刍议  

A rustic opinion about the establishment of criminal judicial precedent systam in China

作　　者：栗克元[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《信阳师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2002年第3期8-12,共5页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：当今世界 ,最原始的大陆法系和英美法系的概念已不复存在。在司法活动中 ,大陆法系国家在成文法阵地的同时 ,已允许判例占一定的地盘 ;英美法系国家虽然仍恪守“遵循先例”的传统 ,但同时也越来越表露出了对成文法的重视。既适用成文法又采纳判例 ,已成为世界各国法制建设的共同趋势。我国是一个有着悠久成文法历史的国家 ,判例曾经在刑事司法活动中占据了重要的地位 ,但在当代 ,判例却仅仅起着参考的作用。近年来 ,我国学者对外国的判例制度进行了探讨 。In the present world,the most primitive concept of continental law system and Anglo American law system no longer exists.In judicial actions the countries of continental law system have made some room for judicial precedent while persisting in formal law.The countries of Anglo American law system attach more and more importance to formal law although they still follow the traditional precedents.It has become a tendency in all countries of the world to use formal law and to adopt judicial precedent at the same time,Our country has a long history of formal law and judicial precedent also took an important place in criminal judicial practice in history of our country.But in contemporary time judicial preceedent is only used for reference in China. In recent years Chinese scholars have made explorations into judicial precdent system of other countries and suggested establishing criminal judicial precedent system.

关 键 词：中国刑事判例制度 功能 建构 

分 类 号：D915.18[政治法律—诉讼法学]