检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨正万[1]
出 处:《中国人民大学学报》2002年第3期100-106,共7页Journal of Renmin University of China
摘 要:惩罚犯罪的制度诱因导致了被害人诉讼地位的低下 ,在提升被害人诉讼地位的世界潮流的推动下 ,我国赋予了被害人以当事人的诉讼地位。然而仍然有学者主张被害人的非当事人地位 ,导致这种认识的原因之一是对被害人诉讼地位价值认识的不到位。对被害人诉讼地位的程序公正价值的研究应从程序中立性、程序平等性、程序参与性、程序公开性、程序对话性等方面展开。The system cause in the punishment of crime leads to the low down of victims position in the litigation procedure. Under the background of the world tide in the elevation of victims position in the litigation procedure, Chinese criminal procedure has ruled that the victim is independent party instead of an ordinary participant. In the same time, however, there is still scholars who argue that victims position should be non party position in the criminal procedure. In my opinion, one of the reasons is the unclear knowledge to the value of victims position in the criminal procedure. So this article has made a statement that the analysis of the value of victims procedural position in procedural justice should be based on the procedural neutrality, procedural equality, procedural participancy, procedural publicity, and procedural dialogism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3