检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药指南》2014年第19期68-69,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨脑干听觉诱发电位联合体感诱发电位评估昏迷患者脑功能状态可行性和准确性。方法选取我院2013年10月至2014年4月的昏迷患者30例,平均将其分成两组,对对照组进行GCS评分、脑干反射等临床评估,动态检测并观察患者预后,对实验组患者实行脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)和体感诱发电位(SEP)检查,探讨BAEP和SEP判断昏迷患者脑功能状态的可行性和准确性。结果实验组的准确率(93.33%)明显高于对照组(66.67%)的准确率,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论脑干听觉诱发电位联合体感诱发电位可以提高昏迷患者预后评估的准确性,在临床上实践中具有重要价值。Objective To study the feasibility and accuracy of applying brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) combined with somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in the prognosis of brain function for coma patients. Methods 30 coma patients in our hospital from October 2013 to April 2014 were selected and divided into 2 groups, the control group was given clinical assessment such as GCS score and brainstem reflection,so as to detect and observe the prognosis of patients dynamically; the experimental group was given BAEP and SEP for prognosis evaluation,then analyzed the feasibility and accuracy. Results The accuracy rate of experimental group (93.33%) was significantly higher than control group (66.67%) , differences were statistically significant (P〈 0.05 ) . Conclusion It can improve the accuracy that applying BAEP combined with SEP in the prognosis evaluation of coma patients, which has important values in clinical practice.
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28