程朱道统论与儒家经典认同  

Cheng Zhu Confucian Orthodoxy's Self- identity with Classics

作　　者：张连伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学人文社会科学学院,北京100083

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2014年第4期38-43,共6页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"朱子四书学之系列比较研究"(13CZX045);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"中国森林生态史研究"(RW2014-08)

摘　　要：近代以来,程朱道统论常常被看作虚构的儒家谱系,其传心之说尤其受到诟病。但从汉宋之间的学术转向,尤其是儒家经典的转向来看,程朱道统论有着经典的学理依据,四书学的兴起与道统论的提出有着内在的关联。道统论显示出宋儒向原始儒学复归的价值取向,四书则是这种复归的经典依据。In modem time, the Cheng Zhu Confucian orthodoxy has long been taken as a fancied Confucian an cestry and its masterpiece has been particularly denounced. Yet seen from the academic transformation from Han and Song Dynastyies, especially the one occurred within the Confucian classics, Cheng Zhu Confucian orthodoxy holds the scientific evidence of classics. Since there are inner relationships between the rising of ＂The Four Books＂, the putting forward of the Confucian orthodoxy indicates the value orientation of the Song Dynasty Confucianism ＇ S regression to the original Confucianism. And ＂The Four Books ＂ is the classical evidence of this regression.

关 键 词：二程 朱熹 道统 五经 四书 

分 类 号：B244.6[哲学宗教—中国哲学]