检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭海鹏[1] 刘木元[1] 杨熙鸿[1] 彭汉伟[1] 麦瑞琴[2]
机构地区:[1]汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院头颈外科,广东汕头515041 [2]汕头大学医学院第一附属医院检验科,广东汕头515041
出 处:《汕头大学医学院学报》2014年第2期100-103,共4页Journal of Shantou University Medical College
基 金:广东省自然科学基金资助项目(S2011010005042)
摘 要:目的:评价新辅助化疗对口腔癌生存率的影响。方法:检索PubMed、中国学术期刊全文数据库中口腔癌新辅助化疗与单纯手术或手术后放疗的临床随机对照试验研究;用Comprehensive Meta Analysis(Version 2.0)软件比较新辅助化疗(755例)与单纯手术或手术后放疗组(719例)在总体、3、5年生存率的差异。结果:15项研究纳入Meta分析。新辅助化疗与单纯手术或手术后放疗组在总体、3、5年生存率均无统计学意义,其中对Ⅲ、Ⅳ期口腔癌患者生存率差异也无统计学意义。结论:在口腔癌综合治疗中,新辅助化疗在提高口腔癌患者生存率无明显优势。Objective: To evaluate the survival effect in patients with oral carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: The databases of PubMed and CNKI had been researched to identify randomized controlled trials compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone or adjuvant chemotherapy for survival in patients with oral carcinoma. The differences of total, 3-and 5-year survival ratio were evaluated by Comprehensive Meta Analysis (Version 2.0). Results: Fifteen studies were combined representing data of 755 cases received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 719 cases received surgery alone or adjuvant chemotherapy for Meta analysis. Generaug.there was no statistical significance between neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone or adjuvant chemotherapy. No significant difference had been found in 3-and 5-year survival. The difference was no significant in survival for patients with Ⅲ-Ⅳ stage. Conclusion: The neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers no advantages for oral carcinoma in terms of survival.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145