检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张国振[1]
出 处:《集宁师范学院学报》2014年第2期36-40,共5页Journal of Jining Normal University
摘 要:仲裁调解兼顾当事人意思自治及程序灵活性,在提高仲裁效率、促进合意达成、减弱执行阻力方面颇有成效,故为当事人及仲裁机构所青睐。现行立法中该制度并不完善,尚需在意思自治及效率原则引导下,对调解时间、方式及效力方面予以补正,以充分发挥仲裁调解的制度优势,契合仲裁发展之需求。The mediation in arbitration takes into consideration both the autonomy of will and the flexibility of procedure,and is effective in promoting the efficiency of arbitration,promoting the achievement of consensus and reducing the difficulty of enforcement,so it is favored by the parties and the arbitral institutions.However,such a system of the arbitral law now is not perfect,so problems about the autonomy of will,the efficiency,the time,the way and the potency of the mediation need to be rectified in order to give full play to the superiority of the mediation system to meet the demands of developing arbitration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40