被告人与律师辩护权冲突及解决机制——从李庄案二审谈起  

Conflict and Solution Between the Defendant and the Defense Counsel's Right to Defense:Reflection upon the Second Instance of Li Zhuang Case

作　　者：王明芳[1] 傅潇蕾 

机构地区：[1]兰州大学马克思主义学院,甘肃兰州730000 [2]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京102249

出　　处：《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期135-140,共6页Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：李庄案在二审阶段出现的被告人当庭认罪,辩护律师仍坚持无罪辩护的现象反映了被告人与律师辩护权冲突的现实问题。目前,我国尚未形成解决辩护权冲突问题的统一定论,综合分析现有的被告人中心主义模式和律师独立辩护模式,并结合我国的具体情况,律师独立辩护模式是我国应对被告人和律师辩护权冲突问题的最佳解决机制,具体实践中应通过律师与被告人的充分协商和明确律师独立辩护的限度,防止律师独立辩护模式可能带来的不利后果。The defendant pleaded guilty in the second instance of Li Zhuang Case, while the defense counsel still insisted that the defendant was innocent. This phenomenon reflects the reality that there exist conflicts between the defendant and the defense counsel. At present, there is not any uniform conclusion as to how to solve the problem caused by the right of defense. Based on an analysis of the defendant＇s egoism and the existing mode of the counsel＇s independent defence and taking into consideration the specific situation in China, this paper points out that a proper mode of the counsel＇s independent defence should be key in solving the problem. The main concern should be the communication and negotiation between the defendant and the defense counsel, and agreement should be reached regarding the degree to which the defense counsel can use his right, so that conflicts between the defendant and the defense counsel will be avoided.

关 键 词：李庄案二审 辩护权冲突 被告人中心主义模式 律师独立辩护模式 限度 

分 类 号：D915.15[政治法律—诉讼法学]