东亚朱子学研究的新方法  

New Methods in the Study of Zhuism in East Asia

作　　者：朱人求[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学哲学系,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第4期94-101,共8页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科重大招标项目"东亚朱子学的承传与创新研究"(13&ZD062);国家社科基金项目"理学话语研究"(12BZX039);中央高校基本科研业务费项目"道学话语分析与中国哲学研究范式的转换研究"(2013221003);教育部重大招标项目"百年朱子学研究精华集成"(2012007)

摘　　要：近年来,东亚朱子学研究在方法论方面正在积极寻求新的突破,"脉络性的转换"的方法、多重文本分析方法、诠释学的方法、比较哲学的方法、话语分析方法等较为新颖的研究方法逐渐引起了学术界的关注。其中,"脉络性转换"方法侧重于思想史研究,多重文本分析方法偏重文献考据与义理探讨,诠释学的方法与比较哲学的方法多为哲学式的探讨,话语分析方法则兼顾语言学、思想史、哲学等多个学科领域,既有理论又有实践,既有普遍性的哲学诠释,又有个体性的身心体认,从而实现新的综合。这些新的研究方法对于未来朱子学研究的走向和突破性成果的取得具有重大的指导意义。In recent years, scholars on Zhuism in East Asia has been actively seeking breakthroughs in methodology. More innovative research methods, such as the ＂contextual conversion＂ method, the multiple text analysis method, the her- meneutical methods, the comparative philosophy method, and the discourse analysis method have been gradually attracting the attention of scholars worldwide. Among these methods, the ＂contextual conversion＂ method focuses on the study of in- tellectual history; the multiple text analysis method pays closer attention to literature reviews and theoretical analysis; the hermeneutical method and the comparative philosophy method involve more philosophical explorations. The discourse analy- sis method is a new comprehensive method incorporating findings and theories in such fields as linguistics, intellectual his- tory, and philology on the basis of both theory and practice, offering not only philosophical interpretations of universal value but also individual experiential insights thereby achieving new syntheses. It is argued that these new methods can guide re- searchers on Zhuism to break new grounds and achieve new breakthroughs in the future.

关 键 词：东亚朱子学 脉络性的转换 多重文本分析方法 话语分析方法 

分 类 号：B244.7[哲学宗教—中国哲学]