检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张文军[1] 王丽[2] 李启英[1] 杨涛[1] 项颖[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆市肿瘤研究所血液肿瘤及生物治疗科,重庆400030 [2]重庆市中山医院肿瘤科,重庆400010
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床与康复》2014年第7期807-809,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
摘 要:目的探讨乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染与弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)预后的相关性。方法选取乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)阳性和HBsAg阴性的初治DLBCL患者各60例,均给予化疗,比较分析两组患者化疗期间的肝功能以及随访2年后的无进展生存时间(PFS)和总生存时间(OS)。结果 HBsAg阳性组和HBsAg阴性组患者化疗期间的肝功能损害发生率分别为66.0%和40.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。HBsAg阳性组患者的PFS为(16.1±3.2)个月,PFS率为70.0%,OS率为85.0%;HBsAg阴性组患者的PFS为(17.3±4.1)个月,PFS率为73.0%,OS率为88.0%,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 HBV感染与DLBCL患者的预后无关,但合并HBV感染会增加DLBCL患者在化疗期间肝功能损害的发生率。Objective To investigate the correlation between prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL) and hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection. Methods 60 HBsAg-positive patients and 60 HBsAg-negative patients with DLBCL were selected, all of the patients were treated by chemothera- py. The liver function during the chemotherapy, the progression-free survival time (PFS) and overall survival time(OS) in the followed 2 years were observed and compared between the two groups. Results The liver function damage rates during chemotherapy of HBsAg-positive group and HBsAg-negative group were 66.0% and 40. 0% ,respectively(P 〈 0. 05 ). The 2-year PFS in the HBsAg-positive group was ( 16. 1 + 3.2) months,with a PFS rate of 70. 0% and an OS rate of 85.0%. In the HBsAg-negative group the PFS was ( 17.3 ~ 4. 1 ) months,the PFS rate was 73.0% and the OS rate was 88.0% ,which were consistent with the HBsAg-postive group(P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion The HBV infection had no significant impaction on clinical features and prognosis in patients with DLBCL, but it can increase the risk of liver damage during the chemotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28