检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]合肥工业大学现代科技发展与马克思主义理论研究中心,合肥230009
出 处:《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第4期35-39,共5页Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(12YJA720012)
摘 要:代孕可分为不同的情况,目前学界有许多支持和反对代孕的理由。文章从进化论和基因伦理以及整体性与个体性的关系三个方面分析了代孕的伦理争论,提出在合理的限度内应当满足人的生育需求,实现人的生育权,但是当代孕过程耗费了大量的社会医疗资源的时候,当个人的生育权与人类社会的整体优化发生严重矛盾冲突的时候,个人的生育权应当受到限制,并提出了若干我国防范代孕的社会规制措施。T he surrogacy types are different and there are different reasons for supporting or opposing surrogacy in academic circle .In this paper ,the ethical controversy of surrogacy phenomenon is ana-lyzed from the perspectives of evolution theory ,genetic ethics and relationship between wholeness and individuality .It is said that the bearing demand of human beings should be satisfied within reasonable limits and the rights of bearing should be fulfilled .However ,when a large amount of social medical resources are spent during the process of surrogacy and when there are strong conflicts between the bearing right of the individual and the general optimization of the human society ,the bearing right of the individual should be limited .The social regulation measures on the surrogacy are also put for-w ard .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222