检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王琛[1] 赖少侣[1] 刘丽东[1] 刘宇[1] 刘思远[1] 黄伟丽[1]
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院影像中心,广西南宁530021
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2014年第7期978-981,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基 金:广西医疗卫生重点科研课题(2010076)
摘 要:目的探讨DWI诊断鼻咽癌颅底斜坡复发瘤价值。方法收集经病理活检或随访证实的22例鼻咽癌放疗后颅底斜坡复发瘤患者和48例无复发患者,分析其常规MRI以及DWI特征,比较二者ADC值的差异,绘制ROC曲线,确定ADC诊断鼻咽癌颅底斜坡复发瘤的阈值。结果 MR平扫示复发与无复发患者的病灶均呈稍长T1稍长T2信号,增强后呈无强化至明显强化。复发患者中,77.27%(17/22)病灶DWI呈高信号,18.18%(4/22)呈等信号,其中21例(21/22,95.45%)病灶ADC图像均呈低或稍低信号;1例(1/22,4.55%)病灶DWI呈等信号、ADC图像呈稍高信号。无复发患者中,91.67%(44/48)病灶DWI呈高信号、ADC图像呈等或稍高信号,8.33%(4/48)病灶DWI呈等或稍低信号,ADC图像呈等或稍低信号。复发患者与无复发患者病灶ADC值差异有统计学意义[(0.78±0.17)×10-3 mm2/s vs(1.67±0.34)×10-3 mm2/s;P=0.002)。以1.018×10-3 mm2/s为ADC诊断复发瘤阈值,其诊断敏感度和特异度分别为95.45%(21/22)和91.67%(44/48),ROC曲线下面积为0.984。结论 DWI诊断鼻咽癌颅底斜坡复发瘤效能较高,具有重要临床应用价值。Objective To explore the diagnostic value of DWI on clivus recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods Totally 22 patients of clivus recurrent of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy and 48 non-recurrent patients confirmed by biopsy or follow-up were collected. The characteristics of routine MRI and DWI were analyzed, and ADC values were compared between recurrent patients and non-recurrent patients. ROC curves were drawn to determine the threshold of ADC value in diagnosing clivus recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Results Recurrent and non-recurrent lesions both showed slightly hypo-intense signal on T1WI, slightly hyper-intense signal on T2WI in plain scanning, no enhancement to obvious enhancement after administration of contrast agent. Among patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma, lesions in 17 patients (17/22, 77.27%) showed hyper-intense signal, while in 4 patients (4/22, 18.18%) showed iso-intense signal on DWI, in 21 patients 95.45% (21/22) showed hypo-intense signal on ADC images. The lesion of one recurrent patient (1/22, 4.55%) showed iso-intense signal on DWI and slightly hyper-intense signal on ADC images. Among non-recurrent patients, lesions in 44 patients (44/48, 91.67%) showed hyper-intense signal on DWI and iso-intense or slightly hyper-intense signal on ADC images, in 4 patients (4/48, 8.33%) showed iso-intense or slightly hypo-intense on DWI and iso-intense or slightly hypo-intense on ADC images. There were significant differences of ADC values between recurrent and non-recurrent patients ([0.78±0.17]×10^-3mm^2/s vs[1.67±0.34]×10^-3mm^2/s, P=0.002). Taken 1.018×10^-3mm^2/s as the diagnostic threshold, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ADC was 95.45% (21/22) and 91.67% (44/48), and the area under ROC curve was 0.984. Conclusion DWI is able to diagnose clivus recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma therefore having great clinical application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.202.164