认知行为干预对慢性龈炎治疗效果的临床研究  

Effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on chronic gingivitis:a clinical trial

作　　者：朱光勋[1] 彭志庆[2] 尹作姣[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院口腔医学中心,湖北武汉430030 [2]重庆医科大学附属永川医院口腔科,重庆永川402160

出　　处：《临床口腔医学杂志》2014年第7期417-419,共3页Journal of Clinical Stomatology

摘　　要：目的:评价认知行为干预对慢性龈炎的治疗效果。方法:采用随机分组法将100名慢性龈炎患者分为实验组和对照组。实验组在牙周基础治疗中除给予常规的口腔卫生指导外,再给予认知行为干预措施;对照组在牙周基础治疗中只给予口腔卫生指导,不给予认知行为干预措施。分别于干预后第1、6、12月通过探诊出血百分率来评价认知行为干预效果。应用SPSS 17.0软件对实验数据进行统计学分析。结果:干预后1个月复诊,实验组和对照组探诊出血百分率均较干预前降低(P<0.05),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在干预后第6、12月,实验组与对照组相比探诊出血百分率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:认知行为干预措施可以有效地控制探诊出血,从而达到防治慢性龈炎的效果。Objective：To investigate the effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on chronic gingivitis. Method：Totally 100 patients with chronic gingivitis were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group received cogni-tive behavioral intervention besides regular oral hygiene instructions,while the control group received only regular oral hy-giene instructions in initial periodontal treatment. Bleeding on probing rate（BOPR） was used to evaluate the effect of cogni-tive behavioral intervention at 1,6,12 months. SPSS 17.0 software package was employed to analyze experimental data sta-tistically. Result：After 1 month,the BOPR of experimental and control group was decreased when compared with that before cognitive behavioral intervention（P〈0.05）,there was no statistically difference between experimental and control group after cognitive behavioral intervention （P 〉0.05）. There was statistically difference between control and experimental group at 6,12 months after cognitive behavioral intervention （P 〈0.05）. Conclusion：It was suggested cognitive behavioral interven-tion could control BOP effectively, thus prevent and treat chronic gingivitis.

关 键 词：认知行为干预 慢性龈炎 探诊出血百分率 

分 类 号：R781.4[医药卫生—口腔医学]