检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李伯友[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市龙岗中心医院口腔科,广东省深圳518116
出 处:《中国基层医药》2014年第15期2249-2250,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:基金项目:广东省深圳市科技计划项目(201103265)
摘 要:目的:评价口腔颌面部损伤患者的生命质量,为制定提高颌面部损伤患者生命质量的措施提供理论依据。方法以SF-36量表对50例口腔颌面损伤患者(外伤组)进行问卷调查,收集包括躯体功能、躯体角色、肌体疼痛、总体健康状况、活力、社会功能、情绪角色和心理健康等8个领域信息,将SF-36所测得的口腔颌面损伤患者生命质量得分与60例健康人群(健康对照组)进行比较,评价颌面损伤患者生命质量。结果外伤组生命质量总分及精神健康领域评分分别为(635.6±100.1)分、(310.5±73.3)分,均低于健康对照组的(677.4±114.1)分、(339.7±66.5)分(t=2.02、2.18,均 P<0.05),但躯体健康领域评分两组差异无统计学意义(t=1.92,P>0.05)。结论颌面损伤患者的总体生命质量及精神健康领域生命质量下降,应该加强对该人群的关爱及心理辅导,提高患者生命质量。Objective To evaluate the quality of life in patients with maxillofacial injuries , and to provide the theoretical basis for the measures to improve the quality of life of the patients .Methods Questionnaire survey with SF-36 scale was conducted in 50 cases with maxillofacial injuries ( the injuries group ) and 60 healthy subjects (the healthy control group),including physical function,role physical,bodily pain,general health,vitality,social func-tion,role emotional and mental health .All data were analyzed by PEMS 3.0 software package .Results The total quality of life and mental component summary of the injuries group were (635.6 ±100.1) points,(310.5 ± 73.3)points,respectively,which were lower than (677.4 ±114.1) points,(339.7 ±66.5) points of the healthy control group(t=2.02,2.18,all P〈0.05).While there was no significant difference in mental component summary between the two groups .Conclusion The life qualities of patients with maxillofacial injuries decline ,and should care for them to improve the quality of life .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222